Ayodhya a emotional verdict

Keeping religion aside Think as a nationalist on Ayodhya case as a property dispute where documents are missing or not promising.

Before you judge which side to support go through the below points:

Babur Vs Rama 

1. Babur ruled only 4 years establishing Mughal empire in India where as Rama ruled for 11000year in Treta Yug (31years as per current Yug)

2. As a king Babur has no achievement or contribution to the country apart from his poems. 

Where as today we refer to Rama Rajya because of his great civilization strategies.

3. Rama never says he Hindu , as per the history Babur consider himself as Fighter for Muslims (Jihad) but not Muslims by any standards

4. Rama is icon since 6000 years but today we give example of Akbar not Babur. Muslim people never wanted to be like Babur but Akbar.

5. Whenever required Rama fought in War whenever required he gave up his kingdom.

6. When Vibhishana helped Rama to fought with Ravaan after the war he gave the kingdom to Vibhishana and same thing with Shugrib.

 But when Babur invited by Daulat Khan Lodi to defeat Ibrahim Lodi and after war he established his empire in Delhi. Wherever Babur went he killed thousands of people and captured the women and children.

7. Nobody in presence general of Muslims should not identified by Babur. Destroying temples selling Hindu women in Kabul or Kazakhstan , no one will become like him.

Now you decide whether the property to be given to built a temple or a Mosque. My opinion the verdict should be on behalf of Rama and if in case court decides to divide property then the mosque should not be named as Babri Masjid. 

Let's wait and watch as few hours left. Practically it looks like a property division verdict.